Interaction to Next Paint (INP) vs. First Contentful Paint (FCP): Key Differences in Core Web Vitals

What is First Contentful Paint (FCP)?

First Contentful Paint (FCP) is a metric that measures the time from when a user navigates to a page until the moment when the first piece of content appears on the screen. This content can be text, an image, or any visual element that gives users an immediate indication that the page is loading. FCP is one of the first indicators of perceived page load speed and is part of Google’s Core Web Vitals.

FCP does not, however, measure interactivity. It solely indicates when users see visual feedback, giving them assurance that the page is actively loading. Pages with a quick FCP can positively influence users’ perceptions of site performance, leading to lower bounce rates.

How FCP is Measured:
– FCP is calculated as the time between navigation and the rendering of the first visible element.
– This metric does not consider content beyond the first element, nor does it track further user interaction.

Why FCP Matters:
– Perceived Load Speed: A quick FCP can improve perceived performance by showing users something on the screen as soon as possible.
– User Engagement: FCP can help determine if users are likely to wait for additional content, but it’s only the first step toward a responsive experience.

What is Interaction to Next Paint (INP)?

Interaction to Next Paint (INP) is a newer metric introduced by Google as part of its expanded Core Web Vitals. It measures a page’s overall responsiveness by tracking the time it takes for the browser to react to user interactions and update the visible content. INP captures the latency between user inputs (like clicks, taps, and keystrokes) and the visual feedback that users see on their screens.

How INP is Measured:
– INP considers all interactions on a page, not just the first, by tracking the longest single interaction latency during a user’s session.
– This includes events triggered by clicks, taps, and keyboard actions, which are often the most common interactions.
– The metric measures the time between a user’s action and the browser’s visual response, providing a more holistic view of a page’s interactivity.

Why INP Matters:
– User Interactivity: INP is more closely aligned with actual user behavior, measuring how quickly a page responds to their actions, which is a key indicator of user experience.
– Performance Evaluation: While FCP tells users that the page is loading, INP shows if the page can keep up with ongoing user interactions, which is critical for engagement and satisfaction.

Key Differences Between FCP and INP

While both FCP and INP play vital roles in web performance metrics, they measure different aspects of a user’s experience and serve distinct purposes.

Why Both FCP and INP Matter for User Experience

A website’s load speed and responsiveness are both critical for providing a positive user experience, but they impact users differently:

1. Reducing User Uncertainty: FCP allows users to know the page is loading. By displaying the first visible element, it mitigates the initial “blank page” effect and reassures users that content is on the way.

2. Ensuring Smooth Interactivity: INP helps ensure that users can engage with the content without delay or lag, which is particularly important for interactive sites, such as e-commerce and social media platforms. Poor INP scores may result in users perceiving a site as sluggish, leading to frustration and possibly abandonment.

3. Complementary Insights: While FCP is excellent for assessing the initial load experience, it cannot account for ongoing interactivity. INP fills this gap by showing how well a page responds once users start engaging with it.

Best Practices for Optimizing FCP and INP

To optimize FCP and INP scores effectively, consider the following best practices:

For Improving FCP:
– Optimize Critical Rendering Path: Minimize render-blocking resources like CSS and JavaScript in the above-the-fold area.
– Use Asynchronous Loading for Scripts: Load non-essential scripts asynchronously or defer them to avoid blocking the initial paint.
– Compress Images and Use Next-Gen Formats: Use optimized image formats, like WebP, and ensure images are scaled appropriately.

For Improving INP:
– Reduce JavaScript Execution Time: Minimize JavaScript and limit the amount of work done on the main thread to improve responsiveness.
– Use Efficient Event Handling: Optimize how the site processes user interactions. Consider throttling or debouncing events that are triggered frequently, like scrolling.
– Optimize Third-Party Scripts: Scripts from external sources can impact responsiveness. Only use necessary third-party scripts, and consider loading them asynchronously when possible.

Measuring FCP and INP Using Google’s Tools

Google offers a range of tools that provide insights into FCP, INP, and other Core Web Vitals:

1. PageSpeed Insights: This tool gives an overview of FCP, INP, and other Core Web Vitals scores along with suggestions for improvement.
2. Lighthouse: Integrated into Chrome DevTools, Lighthouse provides a breakdown of both FCP and INP, allowing developers to diagnose and optimize these metrics.
3. Google Search Console: Within the Core Web Vitals report, Search Console provides a site-wide view of FCP and INP issues, helping prioritize optimization efforts.

FCP and INP represent two important, but different, aspects of web performance. While FCP helps with perceived load speed by showing users that content is on the way, INP focuses on ensuring that users experience smooth and responsive interactions throughout their session. Optimizing both metrics is essential for a seamless user experience, contributing to higher user satisfaction, better engagement, and ultimately improved rankings in search engine results.

By understanding and optimizing both FCP and INP, developers and site owners can create faster, more interactive websites that meet the demands of today’s users and search engines alike.